The media’s rapid coverage of the #NavyYardShooting

The Navy Shipyard in Southeast D.C. (Photo by Wikimedia Commons via the U.S. Navy)
The Washington Navy Yard (Photo by the U.S. Navy).

Even as SWAT teams, snipers and armed Metropolitan Police officers were swarming the Washington Navy Yard in Washington, D.C., news of the #NavyYardShooting was trending worldwide on Twitter.

At least one gunman, but perhaps two more, killed multiple people and injured several others on Monday morning at or near the Naval Sea Systems Command Headquarters building, according to authorities.

And in the 21st century, American citizens sitting on their couches watching CNN were able to know more information about the shooting than a police officer setting up a perimeter only a block away from the crime scene, who may have only been told generalities of the situation when he was dispatched.

It became national news about half an hour after the initial attacks and even before the Metropolitan Police’s Mobile Command unit reached the Navy shipyard area, which is in Southeast D.C.

It is astounding that, just an hour or two after the shooting, the Navy Yard’s Wikipedia page had already been updated to include the shooting incident!

“This section documents a current event,” a disclaimer on the Wikipedia page notes. “Information may change rapidly as the event progresses.”

The Washington Post, as of around 2 p.m. ET, set up a live stream of updates and allowed full free access to, which is what the Boston Globe newspaper did for the week of the Boston Bombings.

In 2013, information spreads like wildfire. Anyone can get any information from anywhere. This is a slight exaggeration, of course, but the point is that media has infused into our culture so heavily that few people realize how much they take in media information.

This is all because a team of journalists, photojournalists and news organizations have crisis plans years in the making to prepare to broadcast breaking information for situations of the like of, say, the Boston Bombings.

In Southern California, one of the top TV news markets in the country, stocked-up news vans from CBS, ABC and NBC are situated so that they can get to a major incident in the Los Angeles area within, literally, minutes.

But the media is not just news organizations; it is anything that is posted on Facebook and Twitter as well. Your Uncle Jimmy may not work for Fox News, but when he posts an update about what he’s seeing if he, say, was at the scene of the crime scene may be considered news.

Media, it must be reminded, has a Latin etymology that means, “intermediate agency, channel of communication,” according to the Online Etymology Dictionary.

This means media includes things from your Facebook and Twitter friends. Media just refers to the means of how someone told you, or wrote to you, something.

Think about what would have happened if there was exactly NO media covering today’s shipyard shooting; that is, if there were no CNN, Washington Post, Facebook and Twitter.

It can be inferred that not very many people actually saw the shooter and many others only became aware of the situation through hearing either the shots or events of the shooting second-hand. If you were a worker at the shipyard in another building the morning would go something like this:

  • You would hear the fire alarms go off and hear people shouting to evacuate, so you’d join the throngs of people running away from the buildings
  • You would see dozens of emergency vehicles and police cars; initially, the scene is chaos
  • You would wait in the area and continue to see dozens more emergency vehicles swarm the area, with little indication why
  • As time goes on, more heavily-armed police and SWAT teams would come
  • This would last for a few hours and you would wonder what happened; eventually, you may ask a policy officer or paramedic on the scene, who may or may not give any information

If you were living in, say, northern D.C., a few miles away from the Navy Shipyard, but did not know anyone who lived or worked near the shipyard (and therefore none of your friends would post anything about it on Facebook), the morning would be like:

  • You would hear countless sirens in the distance
  • Many emergency vehicles would pass by you en route to the crime scene
  • A nearby school may be placed on lockdown, and there will be police officers securing major areas in the area just in case
  • Sirens in the distance would continue for many hours with little indication why

If you were someone living in, say, neighboring Virginia, and did not happen to know someone living or working in the Navy Shipyard area (and therefore none of your Facebook friends posted anything), it would go like this:

  • You might hear some sirens in the distance, if you live close enough
  • A few police cars might come by, from your city’s department coming to D.C. to assist
  • Not much else

If you were someone living in, say, eastern Virginia, a hundred or so miles away and therefore none of the police agencies in your area would be assisting in the investigation, and you did not have any friends living or working near the Navy Shipyard:

  • Perhaps an increased security presence at government buildings and events for a day or two
  • Not much else

The point is, media in the 21st century almost spoils us with how much information we are able to get so quickly. Fifty years ago, an event of this magnitude may have made the evening news, or, if not, the next morning’s paper.

Today, #NavyYardShooting gets a worldwide trending spot within the hour.

Note: As this was written, little more than three hours after news of the shooting spread, full news of the attack was not available.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s